Feature spec
Goal: Send a clear invoice after finishing a job.
- Add a client, line items, a due date, and payment instructions.
- Preview the total before exporting a PDF.
- Keep an editable draft if export fails.
Know what you're signing
$4.99
Evidence scope: No current overall US chart position is available. Category-chart positions shown in discovery are a separate scope. Revenue is a directional model estimate, not verified earnings.
A product spec, screen plans, and build steps for your coding agent.
First kit free with a verified email
Combine features and design from your favorite apps.
Your first Build Kit is free with a verified email.
Generating… usually about a minute.
What should your app do differently? Your note travels with the kit so your coding agent builds around your idea.
A product spec, phased build plan, differentiation notes, and screen references.
Illustrative example: an invoice app for independent contractors. Your kit is tailored to the app you choose; this is not its generated content.
Goal: Send a clear invoice after finishing a job.
Invoice editor: Client at the top, editable line items in the middle, total and preview action at the bottom.
States: Empty draft, validation errors beside each field, exporting, and a retry action that preserves the draft.
Hypothesis: Contractors need faster repeat invoices more than more templates.
First experiment: Test duplicating a previous job with five contractors. Watch where they hesitate before expanding the feature set.
The full kit adds a phased build plan, evidence notes, tool prompts, and implementation guidance. It is a plan for your coding agent, not a finished app.
Usage: Mechanics are fair game; never reuse the original name, branding, assets, or verbatim copy.
JavaScript is required to complete mailbox verification.
Good fit for mobile-first iOS and Android prototypes with managed app scaffolding.
Rork plan preview for The Leveller: map the core Finance workflow, choose the smallest differentiated feature set, define the data and monetization boundaries, then prototype the riskiest user journey first.
Preview ready. Verify your email to reveal and copy the full prompt.
JavaScript is required to complete mailbox verification. Return to this prompt preview.
Affiliate link: CloneChart may earn a commission at no extra cost
These are generated suggestions, not verified review quotations. Check current App Store reviews and speak with users before treating a possible gap as a requirement.
Hypothesis 1
Assumption to check: Users often find finance apps hard to navigate.
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 2
Assumption to check: Transaction entry can be tedious.
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 3
Assumption to check: Visualizations may not be engaging or informative.
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 4
Assumption to check: Budget tracking can be overwhelming.
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Original App Store material. Ratings and screenshots describe the existing app, not proof of demand for your version.
Know what you're signing. Before it's too late. Most people sign contracts they haven't fully read. Not because they don't care — but because contracts are long, dense, and written by people with more legal resource than the person signing them. The Leveller™ changes that. Upload any contract — a PDF, a photo, or pasted text — and The Leveller™ analyses it in plain English, surfacing hidden costs, unfair clauses, risk-shifting language, and power imbalances. Every agreement gets a risk score out of 100 so you know exactly what you're agreeing to before you commit. WHEN YOU CAN'T TALK TO ANYONE Some of the people who need The Leveller™ most are those who have already been harmed — and are now being asked to sign something that limits what they can do next. Settlement agreements with confidentiality clauses. Redress scheme rules that cap recovery. Post-claim insurer letters that reassign rights without explanation. These documents arrive when legal advice is most needed and least affordable. The Leveller™ gives you a way to understand what you are being asked to agree to — privately, without breaching any confidentiality obligation, and without legal fees. WHAT THE LEVELLER™ ANALYSES: Motor finance, mortgages, credit cards, and secured loans Investments, pensions, and structured products Insurance, life cover, and income protection Tenancy, leasehold, and property agreements Legal services agreements and Conditional Fee Agreements (CFAs) Claims management and no win no fee contracts Insurance-backed guarantees (IBGs) and warranties Home improvement, retrofit, cavity wall, and solar panel contracts Settlement agreements and assignment of rights Complaints, redress and arbitration schemes Subrogation and insurer recovery communications Employment, zero hours, and settlement agreements Subscriptions, telecoms, and utilities WHAT YOU GET: A risk score out of 100 Plain-English summary of what you're agreeing to Hidden costs and undisclosed charges identified Red flags rated High, Medium, or Low risk Questions to ask before you sign Strategic guidance on your position A downloadable PDF report to keep or share WHAT TESTERS SAY: "The Leveller is beginning to support people not only before they sign something, but also after harm has already occurred — when they are trying to understand settlement offers, assignments, insurer recovery letters, redress schemes and arbitration processes. That is often when consumers are at their most vulnerable." — Debra Sofia Magdalene, Retrofit Right Campaign BUILT BY GET SAFE — SUPPORT AFTER FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION The Leveller™ was developed by Get SAFE, a UK organisation supporting survivors of financial harm. It is an informed consent tool — not legal advice — designed to put ordinary people on a level footing with the institutions asking them to sign. Know what you're signing.
Written user reviews are not shown here. Check current App Store reviews >
Plan a focused first version with your coding agent. These are planning assumptions, not a delivery guarantee.
Choose one audience and one core workflow. Use the kit to agree on its screens, data, and acceptance criteria before building.
Decide which secondary features, integrations, and platform support can wait. Your version does not need to reproduce everything in the original.
Validate external services, specialist technology, data access, and ongoing costs for your chosen scope.
Not assessed in a Build Kit yet.
A reliable timeline needs an agreed scope and a technical check. Ask your agent to estimate the phases in BUILD_PLAN.md after that review.