Feature spec
Goal: Send a clear invoice after finishing a job.
- Add a client, line items, a due date, and payment instructions.
- Preview the total before exporting a PDF.
- Keep an editable draft if export fails.
Unit Match counts the days of service a daily-rate authorization covers and checks them against the units a payer approved, so a one-day shortfall never slips through.
$1.99
Evidence scope: No current overall US chart position is available. Category-chart positions shown in discovery are a separate scope. Revenue is a directional model estimate, not verified earnings.
A product spec, screen plans, and build steps for your coding agent.
First kit free with a verified email
Combine features and design from your favorite apps.
Kit ready. Verify your email to download it.
Generating… usually about a minute.
What should your app do differently? Your note travels with the kit so your coding agent builds around your idea.
A product spec, phased build plan, differentiation notes, and screen references.
Illustrative example: an invoice app for independent contractors. Your kit is tailored to the app you choose; this is not its generated content.
Goal: Send a clear invoice after finishing a job.
Invoice editor: Client at the top, editable line items in the middle, total and preview action at the bottom.
States: Empty draft, validation errors beside each field, exporting, and a retry action that preserves the draft.
Hypothesis: Contractors need faster repeat invoices more than more templates.
First experiment: Test duplicating a previous job with five contractors. Watch where they hesitate before expanding the feature set.
The full kit adds a phased build plan, evidence notes, tool prompts, and implementation guidance. It is a plan for your coding agent, not a finished app.
Usage: Mechanics are fair game; never reuse the original name, branding, assets, or verbatim copy.
JavaScript is required to complete mailbox verification.
Good fit for mobile-first iOS and Android prototypes with managed app scaffolding.
Rork plan preview for Unit Match: map the core Business workflow, choose the smallest differentiated feature set, define the data and monetization boundaries, then prototype the riskiest user journey first.
Preview ready. Verify your email to reveal and copy the full prompt.
JavaScript is required to complete mailbox verification. Return to this prompt preview.
Affiliate link: CloneChart may earn a commission at no extra cost
Original App Store material. Ratings and screenshots describe the existing app, not proof of demand for your version.
Unit Match counts the days of service a daily-rate authorization covers and checks them against the units a payer approved, so a one-day shortfall never slips through. An authorization written for the first through the last date of service covers both of those dates and every day in between. Subtracting one date from the other leaves out a day that was still a day of care. On a daily-rate authorization, that gap is a day that goes unpaid. Unit Match does the inclusive count for you and shows the work. Features - Enter the first and last date of service by keypad or on the calendar, and get the covered day count right away. - Compare the count against the units authorized and see the exact variance. - View the covered span on the calendar, with any days past the approved units marked. - Copy a plain-language summary to paste into a note or an appeal. - Export a PDF for the file or the payer. - Save counts to revisit for follow-up. Built for medical billers and revenue cycle staff who work daily-rate authorizations, including residential, PHP, and IOP behavioral health. Unit Match is a calculation aid. Always verify the count against the authorization's own terms and the payer's rules before you bill or appeal.
Written user reviews are not shown here. Check current App Store reviews >
These are generated suggestions, not verified review quotations. Check current App Store reviews and speak with users before treating a possible gap as a requirement.
Hypothesis 1
Assumption to check: Limited user feedback on matches
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 2
Assumption to check: No filtering options
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 3
Assumption to check: Lack of user profile customization
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 4
Assumption to check: No analytics or insights
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Plan a focused first version with your coding agent. These are planning assumptions, not a delivery guarantee.
Choose one audience and one core workflow. Use the kit to agree on its screens, data, and acceptance criteria before building.
Decide which secondary features, integrations, and platform support can wait. Your version does not need to reproduce everything in the original.
Validate external services, specialist technology, data access, and ongoing costs for your chosen scope.
From the Build Kit assessment.
A reliable timeline needs an agreed scope and a technical check. Ask your agent to estimate the phases in BUILD_PLAN.md after that review.