Feature spec
Goal: Send a clear invoice after finishing a job.
- Add a client, line items, a due date, and payment instructions.
- Preview the total before exporting a PDF.
- Keep an editable draft if export fails.
Long before our grandparents' days, Macs boasted easy-to-use image editing tools (apps) like MacPaint and SuperPaint
$1.99 · In-app purchases
Evidence scope: No current overall US chart position is available. Category-chart positions shown in discovery are a separate scope. Revenue is a directional model estimate, not verified earnings.
A product spec, screen plans, and build steps for your coding agent.
First kit free with a verified email
Combine features and design from your favorite apps.
Kit ready. Verify your email to download it.
Generating… usually about a minute.
What should your app do differently? Your note travels with the kit so your coding agent builds around your idea.
A product spec, phased build plan, differentiation notes, and screen references.
Illustrative example: an invoice app for independent contractors. Your kit is tailored to the app you choose; this is not its generated content.
Goal: Send a clear invoice after finishing a job.
Invoice editor: Client at the top, editable line items in the middle, total and preview action at the bottom.
States: Empty draft, validation errors beside each field, exporting, and a retry action that preserves the draft.
Hypothesis: Contractors need faster repeat invoices more than more templates.
First experiment: Test duplicating a previous job with five contractors. Watch where they hesitate before expanding the feature set.
The full kit adds a phased build plan, evidence notes, tool prompts, and implementation guidance. It is a plan for your coding agent, not a finished app.
Usage: Mechanics are fair game; never reuse the original name, branding, assets, or verbatim copy.
JavaScript is required to complete mailbox verification.
Good fit for mobile-first iOS and Android prototypes with managed app scaffolding.
Rork plan preview for mioPaint: map the core Graphics & Design workflow, choose the smallest differentiated feature set, define the data and monetization boundaries, then prototype the riskiest user journey first.
Preview ready. Verify your email to reveal and copy the full prompt.
JavaScript is required to complete mailbox verification. Return to this prompt preview.
Affiliate link: CloneChart may earn a commission at no extra cost
These are generated suggestions, not verified review quotations. Check current App Store reviews and speak with users before treating a possible gap as a requirement.
Hypothesis 1
Assumption to check: Users struggle with complex interfaces in drawing apps
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 2
Assumption to check: Performance issues with large canvases
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 3
Assumption to check: Limited sharing options for artworks
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 4
Assumption to check: Difficulty in restoring purchases
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Original App Store material. Ratings and screenshots describe the existing app, not proof of demand for your version.
Long before our grandparents' days, Macs boasted easy-to-use image editing tools (apps) like MacPaint and SuperPaint. However, it seems that these apps have disappeared, replaced by professional apps for artists. Recently, I've found myself wanting to slightly enhance interesting images created using generative AI, but I've been struggling to find a convenient tool. That's why we developed "mioPaint." It's a "rest of us" painting tool that allows even those without artistic talent to easily edit images, including drawing, pen-based retouching, cropping, resizing, text insertion, compositing, cropping, and collages with emojis and generative AI images. It's compatible with iPad and Apple Pencil, iPhone, and Mac. Its built-in widgets allow for quick access to drawings, and keyboard shortcuts increase workflow efficiency. The app features a drawing management function with icons similar to those on the iPad home screen, allowing you to easily manage your work and completed projects. The painting features not only recreate familiar MacPaint-like tools like patterns, fills, and lasso, but also include many new tools like filters, halftone dots, and image and text stamps. Vector data drawing functions for shapes and text are integrated (like MacDraw), allowing unlimited undos while working. Images can be imported from photos, image files, emojis, Genmoji, SF Symbols, AI images generated by Image Playground, videos, and cameras. Finished works can be easily shared with other users via AirDrop. Output files are not only HEIC and JPEG, but also GIF and APNG can be created from multiple images for animation. Other interesting features include image splitting and video recording of the drawing process. While I want even young children who don't remember the old days to use this app and experience the joy of "creating something" on an iPad or iPhone, there's another purpose to developing this app. As longtime Mac programmers, we've continued to develop our products using great apps like MacPaint and SuperPaint as models. When I use recent apps, I worry that the long-standing tradition of Mac development skills and experience may be lost. While AI now allows us to instantly access information about specific features, finding the answer to such vague questions as "What do I need to pay attention to in order to develop an app that works equally well on iPhone, iPad, and Mac?" is no easy task. "mioPaint" was developed by me alone using the Apple Framework, SwiftUI, and UIKit. Using this app as a reference, I plan to explain the key considerations for developing apps for Apple devices, publishing the source code on my website. If you've tried "mioPaint" and are interested in its development process and features, please feel free to refer to project website.
Written user reviews are not shown here. Check current App Store reviews >
Plan a focused first version with your coding agent. These are planning assumptions, not a delivery guarantee.
Choose one audience and one core workflow. Use the kit to agree on its screens, data, and acceptance criteria before building.
Decide which secondary features, integrations, and platform support can wait. Your version does not need to reproduce everything in the original.
Validate external services, specialist technology, data access, and ongoing costs for your chosen scope.
From the Build Kit assessment.
A reliable timeline needs an agreed scope and a technical check. Ask your agent to estimate the phases in BUILD_PLAN.md after that review.