Feature spec
Goal: Send a clear invoice after finishing a job.
- Add a client, line items, a due date, and payment instructions.
- Preview the total before exporting a PDF.
- Keep an editable draft if export fails.
How many times have you gone to the store, selected a watermelon, and then taken it home only to find out it was not very good? Dr
$1.99 · In-app purchases
Evidence scope: No current overall US chart position is available. Category-chart positions shown in discovery are a separate scope. Revenue is a directional model estimate, not verified earnings.
A product spec, screen plans, and build steps for your coding agent.
First kit free with a verified email
Combine features and design from your favorite apps.
Kit ready. Verify your email to download it.
Generating… usually about a minute.
What should your app do differently? Your note travels with the kit so your coding agent builds around your idea.
A product spec, phased build plan, differentiation notes, and screen references.
Illustrative example: an invoice app for independent contractors. Your kit is tailored to the app you choose; this is not its generated content.
Goal: Send a clear invoice after finishing a job.
Invoice editor: Client at the top, editable line items in the middle, total and preview action at the bottom.
States: Empty draft, validation errors beside each field, exporting, and a retry action that preserves the draft.
Hypothesis: Contractors need faster repeat invoices more than more templates.
First experiment: Test duplicating a previous job with five contractors. Watch where they hesitate before expanding the feature set.
The full kit adds a phased build plan, evidence notes, tool prompts, and implementation guidance. It is a plan for your coding agent, not a finished app.
Usage: Mechanics are fair game; never reuse the original name, branding, assets, or verbatim copy.
JavaScript is required to complete mailbox verification.
Good fit for mobile-first iOS and Android prototypes with managed app scaffolding.
Rork plan preview for Dr. Thump Pro: map the core Food & Drink workflow, choose the smallest differentiated feature set, define the data and monetization boundaries, then prototype the riskiest user journey first.
Preview ready. Verify your email to reveal and copy the full prompt.
JavaScript is required to complete mailbox verification. Return to this prompt preview.
Affiliate link: CloneChart may earn a commission at no extra cost
These are generated suggestions, not verified review quotations. Check current App Store reviews and speak with users before treating a possible gap as a requirement.
Hypothesis 1
Assumption to check: Limited restaurant options in certain areas
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 2
Assumption to check: Inconsistent user experience in loading times
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 3
Assumption to check: Difficulty in finding specific cuisines
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Hypothesis 4
Assumption to check: Lack of personalized recommendations
Validate with people who use this workflow before building.
Original App Store material. Ratings and screenshots describe the existing app, not proof of demand for your version.
How many times have you gone to the store, selected a watermelon, and then taken it home only to find out it was not very good? Dr. Thump Pro is an app that has been developed after years of research to take the randomness out of the process of selecting a quality watermelon of any type. By using the sound made from thumping a watermelon along with its general size, the app can predict the general level of sweetness or bitterness of the watermelon before purchase. When using the app, the sweetness or bitterness of the watermelon will be displayed using a brix scale, which is designed to measure the sugar content in fruit juices. The lower the number, the more bitter the watermelon. The higher the number, the sweeter and less bitter. A typical watermelon is a 7 on this scale. Ideally, you are looking for values of 8 and above. For anything less than a 7, we recommend putting it back as it will be bitter tasting. When using the app, watermelons can be situated in a bin or removed and tested in isolation. When thumping, you can use your knuckles or fist. For a lot of testing to save your knuckles, we recommend something hard and solid, such as a cue ball or hard plastic disk (as in a caster wheel). Whatever the object, it should not make a noise itself—such as a ringing or clanking sound—after you thump the watermelon. A tutorial video on using this app can be found here: https://youtu.be/L7y10r6bS0Q. This video can also be accessed anytime through the tutorial option in the settings menu.
Written user reviews are not shown here. Check current App Store reviews >
Plan a focused first version with your coding agent. These are planning assumptions, not a delivery guarantee.
Choose one audience and one core workflow. Use the kit to agree on its screens, data, and acceptance criteria before building.
Decide which secondary features, integrations, and platform support can wait. Your version does not need to reproduce everything in the original.
Validate external services, specialist technology, data access, and ongoing costs for your chosen scope.
From the Build Kit assessment.
A reliable timeline needs an agreed scope and a technical check. Ask your agent to estimate the phases in BUILD_PLAN.md after that review.